Automated HIV/Hepatitis C Screening Protocol Demonstrates High Efficacy

emergency department
emergency department
Implementation of an electronic health record automatically linking HIV/hepatitis C virus screening to laboratory ordering for adult patients was found to be more effective than a nurse-driven protocol.

Implementation of an electronic health record automatically linking HIV/hepatitis C virus screening to laboratory ordering for adult patients was found to be more effective than a nurse-driven protocol, according to data published in the Annals of Emergency Medicine.

Investigators employed a before-after comparative effectiveness cohort study to compare the numbers of patients screened and the number of newly diagnosed infections in the emergency department, using either the nurse-order screening algorithm protocol or the automated-laboratory-order algorithm. Each algorithm was assessed for 5 months, and all patients aged 18 to 75 years who were receiving treatment during the 5-month periods were eligible.

The differences in the percentage of patients receiving screening for HIV using each protocol was 33.9% during the automated protocol vs 19.6% during the nurse-driven protocol (difference, 14.3%; 95% CI, 13.4%-15.1%). Differences in hepatitis C screening between automated and nurse-driven protocols were 35.1% vs 14.2%, respectively (difference, 20.9%; 95% CI, 20.1%-21.7%). During the automated protocol, more patients had newly diagnosed infections: 23 vs 17 for HIV, and 101 vs 29 for hepatitis C virus. Results were also more often available before discharge during the automated protocol: 87.2% vs 65.1% for HIV, and 90.0% vs 65.4% for hepatitis C virus. Also, fewer patients underwent repeated screening during the automated protocol for HIV and hepatitis C, at 1.6% vs 5.8% and 1.3% vs 4.5%, respectively.

Although both protocols failed to achieve universal screening according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definitions, an electronic health record algorithm that links non-targeted opt-out HIV and hepatitis C virus screening to physician laboratory ordering was “more effective and better integrated than a model reliant on nursing staff to routinely offer screening.” The use of electronic records in most emergency departments in the United States also means this method could be easily replicated; many rural and suburban areas will likely benefit from the practice of expanding hepatitis C virus screening in light of the “widespread nature of the opioid epidemic in the United States.” Investigators also found that one third of newly diagnosed patients with hepatitis C were outside of the birth cohort, providing further support for a policy of non-targeted screening for all adults, and recommend that the automated model be the standard for future programs.


Continue Reading

Related Articles

Reference

White DAE, Todorovic T, Petti ML, Ellis KH, Anderson ES. A comparative effectiveness study of two nontargeted HIV and hepatitis C virus screening algorithms in an urban emergency department [published online June 21 2018]. Ann Emerg Med. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.05.005.