|This article is part of Infectious Disease Advisor’s coverage of IDWeek 2017™, which took place in San Diego, CA. Our staff will be reporting on the latest breaking research and clinical advances in infectious diseases. Check back regularly for highlights from IDWeek 2017.|
SAN DIEGO — In a recent retrospective, cohort study presented at IDWeek 2017, vancomycin (VAN) administered via continuous infusion (CIV) was not only found to achieve the recommended VAN trough (TR) of 15-20mg/L faster but with less risk of adverse events compared to administration via intermittent infusion (IIV).
The study included pediatric patients ages 3 months to 18 years with a creatinine clearance of >30mL/min/1.73m2 who were infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Differences in total daily dose (TDD), AUC24, and AUC24/MIC were the primary endpoints of the study. Secondary endpoints assessed adverse events. The study authors noted that only the maximum VAN levels and TDD observed in the first 72 hours of therapy were included in the analysis.
A total of 22 patients were included in the study: 11 patients in the IIV group and 11 patients in the CIV group. Baseline demographics of the groups were similar, but 45% of patients in the IIV group (5/11) received concomitant nephrotoxic drugs compared to 91% of patients in the CIV group (10/11) (P =.03).
The study authors reported, “Patients in the IIV group received more VAN (median, mg/kg/day) (85 vs 67, P =.08) and had higher median AUC24 (mg*h/L (723 vs 572, P =.02) compared to CIV.”
Results also showed that IIV patients attained a lower median TR compared to CIV patients (16mcg/L and 25mcg/L, respectively). Additionally, for IIV patients, it took 50.9 hours (IQR 42, 70) to achieve this TR level, compared 21.5 hours (IQR 17, 34) for CIV patients (P =.04).
A median VAN MIC of 1mcg/mL was reported for both groups. Additionally, the study authors noted, “A trend towards higher AUC24/MIC was observed in IIV group (752 vs 621, P =.07).” VAN-related adverse events (ie, renal toxicity, infusion reactions, and phlebitis) were experienced by 64% of IIV patients (7/11) compared to 9% of CIV patients (1/11) (P =.01).
For pediatric patients with MRSA infections, administration of VAN via CIV not only achieved the recommended PD target more efficiently but with a decreased risk of adverse events as well when compared to administration via IIV.
|Visit Infectious Disease Advisor’s conference section for continuous coverage from IDWeek 2017.|
Dakhlallah A, Adler-Shohet FC, Arrieta A, Tuan Tran M. Vancomycin (VAN) administered as continuous infusion (CIV) versus intermittent infusion (IIV) in children with Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. Presented at: IDWeek 2017; October 4-8, 2017; San Diego, CA. Abstract 824.
This article originally appeared on MPR