Antipseudomonal Monotherapy Efficacious in Pneumonia

Share this content:
Older adults who received empiric combination antipseudomonal therapy for community-onset pneumonia fared worse than those who received monotherapy.
Older adults who received empiric combination antipseudomonal therapy for community-onset pneumonia fared worse than those who received monotherapy.
This article is part of Infectious Disease Advisor's coverage of IDWeek 2018, taking place in San Francisco, CA. Our on-site staff will be reporting on the latest breaking research and clinical advances in infectious diseases. Check back regularly for highlights from IDWeek 2018.

SAN FRANCISCO — Antipseudomonal combination therapy has shown poorer efficacy than antipseudomonal monotherapy among individuals with suspected pseudomonal pneumonia. This research was recently presented at IDWeek 2018, held October 3-7, 2018, in San Francisco, California.

This population-based cohort study included 31,027 individuals, 77% of whom were given antipseudomonal monotherapy and 23% of whom were given antipseudomonal combination therapy. The 2 groups were similar in the demographics of age, race, and sex. Individuals were stratified according to their risk profiles, with 59% classified low-risk, 24% medium risk, and 18% high risk. The 30-day mortality for these groups was 13%, 21%, and 36%, respectively. 

The low-risk group displayed the greatest disparity in unadjusted mortality between the 2 cohorts, with individuals receiving antipseudomonal combination therapy at 18% risk and those receiving antipseudomonal monotherapy at 8% risk; the medium-risk group showed 24% and 18% mortality risk respectively, and the high-risk group showed 39% and 33% mortality risk, respectively. Overall, antipseudomonal combination therapy was linked with a 1.54 times higher adjusted risk of 30-day mortality than the antipseudomonal monotherapy (95% CI, 1.43-1.66). Among the low-risk group, the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) was 1.69 (95% CI, 1.50-1.89); among the medium-risk group aOR was1.30 (95% CI, 1.14-1.48), and among the high-risk group, aOR was1.21 (95% CI, 1.04-1.40).

Data for this study was collected from over 150 Veteran Health Administration hospitals. A published rule was used to classify individuals into risk groups for drug-resistant pathogens. Assignment to antipseudomonal combination therapy or antipseudomonal monotherapy was decided depending on which antibiotics had been administered in the initial 2 days of hospitalization. To investigate whether treatment choice was linked with 30-day mortality, distinct multivariable logistic regression models were built and adjusted for varying baseline features.

The study researchers concluded that “[older] adults who received empiric combination antipseudomonal therapy for community-onset pneumonia fared worse than those who received monotherapy. Empiric combination antipseudomonal therapy should not be routinely offered to all patients suspected of having pseudomonal pneumonia.”

Visit Infectious Disease Advisor's conference section for continuous coverage live from IDWeek 2018.

Reference

Obodozie-Ofoegbu O, Teng C, Mortensen EM, Frei CR. Empiric pseudomonal monotherapy versus combination therapy for community-onset pneumonia in older adults. Poster presented at: Infectious Diseases Week; October 3-7, 2018; San Francisco, CA. Abstract 1881.

You must be a registered member of Infectious Disease Advisor to post a comment.

Upcoming Meetings

Sign Up for Free e-newsletters